Skip to content

Thermal stability tests

Pack/system tests where the failure mode being verified is thermal — either an external fire impinging on the pack, or thermal runaway initiated inside the pack. Both live under clause 5.2.7 of GB 38031-2025 and both exclude nickel-hydride packs/systems.

# Clause Test Object Pass Status
23 8.2.7.1 External fire pack / system No explosion (fire allowed) revised (both)
24 8.2.7.2 / App. C Thermal propagation pack / system / vehicle No fire, no explosion + 5-min warning + smoke condition revised (both)

How they differ

External fire Thermal propagation
Threat origin Fire outside the pack (gasoline pool fire) Thermal runaway inside a single cell
Pass bar No explosion only No fire, no explosion, 5-min warning, smoke safe
Insulation required after? No No
Observation 2 h or until ext. T < 45 °C Until all monitor points ≤ 60 °C, min 2 h
Vehicle-level option No Yes

Why thermal propagation gets its own deep dive

Clause 5.2.7 b) plus Appendix C is the most consequential change in GB 38031-2025. It re-defines what passing looks like for an EV battery pack: a single-cell thermal runaway must not propagate to a pack-level fire or explosion. The pack-side procedure, the OEM documentation package, the trigger methods, and the runaway-confirmation rule are explained in the dedicated Thermal propagation deep dive.

Source: GB 38031-2025, clauses 5.2.7 (PDF p. 12) and 8.2.7 (PDF p. 23–24); Appendix C (PDF p. 26, 34–38).