WP-08 Packaging Module Library and DFM Assistant
| Field |
Value |
| Priority |
High |
| Status |
Framing |
| Problem Space |
packaging and Sondermaschinenbau applications |
| Linked Capability |
domain-specific DFM, product-family knowledge, packaging workflows |
| Best Collaboration Shape |
applied thesis + pilot + domain prototype |
| Owner |
unassigned |
What This Work Package Is
Build a packaging-machine-specific module library and DFM/review assistant that uses domain structure instead of only general-purpose engineering abstractions.
Why It Matters To RapidDraft
- grounds the research in a real customer context
- creates a differentiated vertical story
- turns generic DFM or drawing ideas into pilot-shaped work
Candidate Lanes
| Lane |
People or Group |
Why They Matter |
Best First Ask |
Priority |
| Hochschule Kempten IDF |
Frank Schirmeier and Ulrich Göhner |
strongest packaging + industrial GenAI + CAD-graph logic signal |
applied mini-project or thesis around SOMIC-like domain reasoning |
High |
| TU Dresden / Fraunhofer IVV |
Jens-Peter Majschak |
strongest packaging-machinery and digital-assistance signal |
packaging pilot framing conversation |
High |
| Hochschule München applied lane |
Vahid Salehi Douzloo |
possible local execution wrapper if the packaging domain model is already defined |
second-wave applied prototype discussion |
Medium |
Recommended Next Actions
- Decide whether the first packaging wedge is review, DFM, or knowledge retrieval.
- Use SOMIC context to keep the ask concrete.
- Keep the first pilot to one module or review family.
Open Questions
- Is Kempten or TU Dresden the better first packaging lane?
- Should packaging remain a single work package or later split into multiple domain-specific pages?
Sources
TextCAD/04_Marketing and Outreach/13_Universities/deep-research-report.mdTextCAD/04_Marketing and Outreach/13_Universities/deep-research-report Monster.md