Their tools¶
How Theegarten-Pactec runs engineering today — the stack we must fit into, not replace.
Stack diagram¶
flowchart LR
SW[SOLIDWORKS\nMechanical]
EP[EPLAN\nElectrical]
CIM[CIM Database\nPLM — system of record]
SW --> CIM
EP --> CIM
| Tool | Role |
|---|---|
| SOLIDWORKS | 3D models, drawings, mechanical BOM |
| EPLAN | Electrical schematics, devices, electrical BOM |
| CIM Database | Released parts, drawings, projects, workflows, audit trail |
Packaging machines are built as modules and assemblies. A small mechanical change can affect electrical sensors, BOM lines, and release documents together.
How work should flow (with RapidDraft)¶
flowchart TD
A[Design in SOLIDWORKS / EPLAN] --> B[Release package in CIM Database]
B --> C[RapidDraft review]
C --> D[Findings report]
D --> E[Engineer approves release]
- Engineers do not upload random files to a separate AI website.
- RapidDraft reads released data from the PLM side.
- CIM Database stays authoritative for status and revisions.
Technical detail: PLM integration
CIM Database (short)¶
CONTACT Software PLM — used to consolidate mechanical and electrical data.
What matters for us:
- Drawings and parts live in PLM with revision control
- Workflow / release states can trigger a review
- Public REST / OpenAPI and Catalyst integration layer exist
- Available on-prem or cloud — Theegarten’s mode must be confirmed in discovery
We should not claim full API coverage until CONTACT confirms their tenant. Open questions: PLM integration (bottom of page).
What RapidDraft checks (mechanical focus)¶
| Check type | Example |
|---|---|
| Drawing completeness | Missing dimensions, title block, revision |
| Drawing ↔ BOM | Part numbers, quantities, phantom lines |
| Revision discipline | Drawing rev vs BOM vs PLM status |
| Cross-discipline | Mechanical bracket vs EPLAN sensor tag |
| Release package | Required documents linked before release |
Not in phase 1: automatic EMPB / inspection-plan generation (Quality forms).
Next¶
Release check demo — what we show in the meeting.