Ratings Matrix¶
This page scores each normalized option under two lenses.
Pilot lens: what it takes to show credibly in the next 2-3 days for SOMICProduct lens: what it takes to implement as a stronger reusable capability
Rating Scale¶
Complexity¶
1: trivial glue or polish2: bounded feature work3: moderate multi-surface work4: substantial cross-system work5: deep integration or platform work
Impact¶
1: low signal for SOMIC2: nice-to-have3: useful4: strong differentiator5: likely core reason they say yes
Time¶
Pilot lens:<0.5 day,0.5-1 day,1-2 days,2-3 days,>3 daysProduct lens:days,1-2 weeks,2-4 weeks,1-2 months,2+ months
Comparison Table¶
| Option | Pilot complexity | Pilot impact | Pilot time | Product complexity | Product impact | Product time | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revision-before-release review session | 3 | 5 | 1-2 days | 3 | 5 | 2-4 weeks | This is the corpus-wide center of gravity and the cleanest match to Florian's email topic. |
| Change summary / revision diff | 3 | 5 | 1-2 days | 4 | 5 | 2-4 weeks | The strongest single feature across the sources; trust hinges on making it evidence-based, not vague. |
| Release-readiness checklist / DraftLint gate | 2 | 5 | 0.5-1 day | 3 | 5 | 1-2 weeks | A deterministic gate reads immediately as useful for release discipline and complements the diff story. |
| DFM on representative SOMIC parts | 2 | 4 | 0.5-1 day | 3 | 4 | 1-2 weeks | Strong supporting demo, especially with Haag-style machined parts, but still secondary to revision review. |
| One-click report / release evidence packet | 2 | 5 | 0.5-1 day | 3 | 5 | 1-2 weeks | Repeatedly recommended and highly leverageable because SOMIC is documentation-heavy. |
| Issue log / review container / closure workflow | 3 | 4 | 1-2 days | 4 | 5 | 2-4 weeks | A strong differentiator, but a thin vertical slice may be enough for the first pilot. |
| SOMIC 434 / QuickChange / format-variant demo scenario | 2 | 4 | 0.5-1 day | 4 | 4 | 1-2 months | Excellent narrative wrapper for the demo, but not by itself the primary product wedge. |
| Folder-based or export-based pilot integration | 2 | 4 | 0.5-1 day | 2 | 4 | days | Best low-risk integration path when stack certainty is low and time is short. |
| PDM task / dispatch integration | 3 | 4 | 1-2 days | 4 | 5 | 1-2 months | Attractive if SOMIC is truly on SolidWorks PDM, but still conditional on customer environment confirmation. |
| Full PDM API / add-in / data-card write-back | 5 | 3 | >3 days | 5 | 5 | 2+ months | Deep integration upside is real, but it is the highest-risk and slowest path in the corpus. |
| Store-back of reports into PDM or PLM | 3 | 3 | 1-2 days | 4 | 4 | 1-2 months | Useful for operational embedding, but the pilot does not need this to prove core value. |
| Cross-project analytics / reuse / metadata-driven analysis | 4 | 2 | >3 days | 4 | 4 | 1-2 months | Strategically interesting, but most sources treat it as an extension rather than a first close lever. |
| Future path: NX-guided drawing generation or deeper PLM coupling | 5 | 2 | >3 days | 5 | 4 | 2+ months | Clearly roadmap material in this corpus, not a near-term SOMIC pilot feature. |
| Optional teaser: cost estimation | 2 | 2 | <0.5 day | 3 | 3 | 1-2 weeks | A light teaser can help, but the sources treat it as optional, not central. |
Recommended Ordering By Pilot Lens¶
Tier 1: build or polish now¶
- Revision-before-release review session
- Change summary / revision diff
- Release-readiness checklist / DraftLint gate
- One-click report / release evidence packet
Tier 2: include if they strengthen the story without derailing it¶
- DFM on representative SOMIC parts
- SOMIC 434 / QuickChange / format-variant demo scenario
- Folder-based or export-based pilot integration
- Issue log / review container / closure workflow
Tier 3: mention as next step, not first commitment¶
- PDM task / dispatch integration
- Store-back of reports into PDM or PLM
- Cross-project analytics / reuse / metadata-driven analysis
Tier 4: roadmap only¶
- Full PDM API / add-in / data-card write-back
- Future path: NX-guided drawing generation or deeper PLM coupling
- Optional teaser: cost estimation
Biggest Practical Tension¶
The corpus strongly supports deep PDM integration as a differentiator, but it also strongly supports avoiding stack-dependent execution in the first sprint.
That is why this matrix scores:
Folder-based or export-based pilot integrationhigh for pilot practicalityPDM task / dispatch integrationmedium-high but conditionalFull PDM API / add-in / data-card write-backlow for pilot practicality and high for long-term upside
Open Questions¶
- Should we keep both the pilot lens and product lens in future target-company pages, or reserve the two-lens model for deeper pilot dossiers?
- Does SOMIC's next reply justify moving
PDM task / dispatch integrationup a tier?
Sources¶
Options CatalogRecommendationclaude_solidworksPDM.mdclaude_somic_pilot_strategy.docxdeepresearch_report_solidworkspdm.docxdeepresearch_report_somic.docxgpt_solidworkspdm.mdPerplexity_solidworks_PDM.mdPerplexity_SOMIC Packaging deep dive and RapidDraft pilot focus.mdperplexity_usesolidworkspdm_withrapiddraft.md