Skip to content

RapidDraft Core

Operational source:

C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\00_Project_Management_n_skills\01_tracks\rapiddraft-core

This page mirrors the detailed operational tracking for this track so the deployed wiki shows the same score tables as the source TRACKING.md.

Last updated

2026-04-10

Scoring model

This track uses milestone and feature scorecards.

Score guide:

  • 100 means complete, validated, and stable for current scope
  • 90-99 means strong and working, but still carrying meaningful gaps
  • 75-89 means materially working, but still missing important completeness
  • 50-74 means real foundation exists, major parts are still absent
  • below 50 means early, partial, or mostly planned

For this hybrid product-definition track, a score of 100 requires product definition plus clear implementation ownership plus active source evidence from repos or delivered assets.

Evidence sources reviewed

  • C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\00_Project_Management_n_skills\01_tracks\rapiddraft-core\MASTER_PLAN.md
  • C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\TextCAD_Wiki\docs\01_RapidDraft\_INDEX.md
  • C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\TextCAD_Wiki\docs\00_Meta\Projects_Map.md
  • D:\02_Code\45_merged_macos_colabui_dfmanim
  • C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\00_Project_Management_n_skills\01_tracks\cad-intelligence\handover\260408_railway-one-service-simplification.md
  • C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\00_Project_Management_n_skills\01_tracks\cad-intelligence\handover\260408_rule-driven-review-preparation-pipeline-plan.md

Current overall score

RapidDraft Core overall score: 79 / 100

Why the score is not higher: RapidDraft Core now has a much clearer runtime identity and a materially stronger pilot-facing workflow than it did in March. The score is still held back by collaboration/issue-system depth and by the need to keep runtime-verification discipline tighter than simple branch or deploy success.

Milestone scorecard

Milestone Score / 100 Current state What it helps achieve Main remaining gap
1. Review-companion scope definition 95 Strong and documented Keeps the product boundary understandable for pilots and engineering work. Needs continued discipline as more modes share the same shell.
2. Drawing-analysis lane definition 64 Partial and distributed Brings drawing validation into the Core story. Still less integrated than the model-review and DFM paths.
3. DFM-backed review flow 86 Materially working Connects manufacturability intelligence to the customer-facing review story. Hosted/runtime confidence must keep pace with branch velocity.
4. Issue and review collaboration surface 44 Mostly planned Makes RapidDraft a collaboration product rather than a one-shot checker. Persistent issue-system depth is still limited.
5. Implementation ownership map 82 Clear enough for current phase Prevents confusion about which repo is the real Core runtime. Historical repo boundaries still need careful explanation in some docs.
6. Pilot-ready product baseline 84 Materially working Makes Core presentable for real pilot conversations and workflows. Needs continued live verification and polish rather than a new ownership reset.

Feature scorecard

Feature track Score / 100 What it helps achieve Current note
Change review 61 Gives users a concrete review-centric entry point. Still meaningful, but less mature than the DFM-backed review lane.
Drawing analysis 54 Broadens Core beyond model review. Present in the product story, but not yet the strongest active runtime lane.
Issue tracking 40 Makes decisions traceable over time. The need is clear, but the persistent collaboration surface remains shallow.
DFM review 86 Connects design review to manufacturability. Now one of the clearest product strengths in the integrated shell.
Collaboration surface 45 Reinforces the collaboration-first positioning. Narrative remains ahead of fully realized product behavior.
Pilot-facing workflow clarity 88 Makes the product legible for customer and pilot conversations. The integrated runtime and protected pilots path are much easier to explain now.

Current headline assessment

RapidDraft Core is now a real integrated product surface, not just a product-definition layer spread across older repos. The merged shell, shared app/pilots runtime story, and stronger DFM workflow moved this track meaningfully forward.

The next gap is not ownership confusion. It is deepening collaboration behavior while preserving runtime trust and clear rollout language.

Highest-value next actions

  1. Keep the integrated repo and shared app shell documented as the canonical Core surface.
  2. Deepen the collaboration and issue-management layer without destabilizing the current pilot workflow.
  3. Maintain explicit separation between implemented, locally validated, and runtime-verified when documenting product readiness.

Sources

  • C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\00_Project_Management_n_skills\01_tracks\rapiddraft-core\MASTER_PLAN.md
  • C:\Users\adeel\OneDrive\100_Knowledge\203_TextCAD\01_Product_Project_Management\00_Project_Management_n_skills\01_tracks\rapiddraft-core\TRACKING.md